Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Kirk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1940No. Appeals, 164 and 236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

The defendant, Howard T. Kirk, has taken two appeals. The one, No. 164, from the refusal of the court below to grant him a new trial; the other, No. 236, from the entry of judgment on the whole record in favor of the additional defendants.

The action was in trespass, brought by Wilmer Carroll, the owner of a Plymouth coach automobile, against Kirk, the owner and driver of a truck with which it collided on July 22, 1937, to recover ’the property damage which he sustained because of the collision. ; í ¡'

The plaintiff was not in the car at the time of the collision. It was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rau v. MankoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Dougherty v. Merchants Baking CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Schuster v. LargmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. United Societies of Greek Catholic Religion of U. S. v. KlochakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Jones Et Ux. v. StifflerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LONGBERRY v. PaulSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Pniewski v. KundaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Barker v. Barrett (Felker)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Stefanick v. Dawson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API