Legal Opinion

Lucero v. Van Wie

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Marilyn Clark Lucero (Lucero) appeals from the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment1 in favor of Lila Van Wie (Van Wie). The trial court determined that the property disclosure provisions of SDCL 43-4-38 through SDCL 43-4-44 were waived by the parties freely negotiated contract which provided the property was to be purchased “as is.” We affirm.

PACTS

[¶ 2.] Van Wie lived in a rural area outside of Custer, South Dakota, on approximately 82 acres of property. Lucero and Van Wie were close personal friends. Lucero would frequently visit Van Wie at her…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kobbeman v. OlesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Delano v. PetteysSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Muhlenkort v. Union County Land TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ridley v. Lawrence County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. TalaricoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Oxton v. RudlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Fuller v. CrostonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API