Oxton v. Rudland
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Retired Justice
[HI.] The purchasers of a home brought suit against the sellers for fraud and failure to disclose defects. The circuit court dismissed the purchasers’ claims on summary judgment. The purchasers appeal. We reverse and remand.
Background
[¶2.] In February 2013, Dwight Oxton executed a purchase agreement for a home located at 1017 Gladys Street in Rapid City, South Dakota owned by Eugene and Cathy Rudland. The Rudlands had purchased it for $165,000 from Todd and Kari Wang just a couple months before—in December 2012 and listed it for sale for $262,500. When the Rudlands…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sabbagh v. Professional & Business Men's Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Hansen Housing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Campion v. Parkview ApartmentsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Wildeboer v. South Dakota Junior Chamber of Commerce, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Subsurfco, Inc. v. B-Y Water DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zochert v. Protective Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Estate of Stoebner v. HuetherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Ries v. Jm Custom Homes, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Larimer v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Johnson v. UPSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.