Gridley v. Selleck
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALENTINE, J., pro tem.
A demurrer to the complaint in this action was sustained, and the plaintiff given ten days to amend her complaint, which she failed to do. After the entry of her default a motion to dismiss the action was made and granted, and judgment of dismissal subsequently entered. From that judgment plaintiff takes this appeal. The demurrer was general and special. The minute order simply recites: “This cause came on regularly to be heard on demurrer. Demurrer sustained. Ten days to amend.” The demurrer, among other matters, specifies: “That said complaint is uncertain in this:…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Panter v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lamb v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950