Legal Opinion

Gridley v. Selleck

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1928No. Docket No. 5041PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VALENTINE, J., pro tem.

A demurrer to the complaint in this action was sustained, and the plaintiff given ten days to amend her complaint, which she failed to do. After the entry of her default a motion to dismiss the action was made and granted, and judgment of dismissal subsequently entered. From that judgment plaintiff takes this appeal. The demurrer was general and special. The minute order simply recites: “This cause came on regularly to be heard on demurrer. Demurrer sustained. Ten days to amend.” The demurrer, among other matters, specifies: “That said complaint is uncertain in this:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Panter v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lamb v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API