Legal Opinion
Harvieux v. Progressive N. Ins. Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 2018No. 28159PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJensen, Justice
[¶ 1.] Nicole Harvieux filed an action under her uninsured motorist insurance coverage (UM) with Progressive Northern Insurance Company for injuries she sustained in a car accident. Harvieux also filed claims of bad faith and barratry against Progressive. The UM claim was bifurcated from the other claims and resulted in a jury verdict of $16,296.75. Following the jury verdict, the circuit court granted Progressive's renewed motion for summary judgment on the claims for bad faith and barratry. Harvieux appeals. We affirm.
Background
[¶ 2.] On November 29, 2007, Harvieux's vehicle was struck from…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Hein v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Citibank (S.D.), N.A. v. HauffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Mordhorst v. Dakota Truck Underwriters & Risk Administration ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Zochert v. Protective Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Knecht v. EvridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Zhi Gang Zhang v. RasmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Estate of Stoebner v. HuetherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Graff v. Children's Care Hospital and SchoolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.