Legal Opinion

Mordhorst v. Dakota Truck Underwriters & Risk Administration Services

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2016No. 27771PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶1.]' James “Jake” Mordhorst sued Dakota Truck Underwriters and Risk Administration Services (collectively, “Insurers”), alleging they denied him workers’ compensation benefits in bad faith. Insurers moved to dismiss, arguing Mordhorst failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The circuit court granted Insurers’ motion, and Mordhorst appeals. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶ 2.] Twenty-year-old Mordhorst worked for Fischer Furniture in Rapid City. While making a delivery on November 10, 2011, a 275-pound…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. George Wiles, Doing Business as Arcadia Valley Office Supply v. Capitol Indemnity Corporation Brown & James, P.C. Nixon and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Champion v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harvieux v. Progressive N. Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Zochert v. Protective Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Lagler v. Menard, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Lead GHR Enters., Inc. v. Am. States Ins. Co.United States District Court · 2019
  5. Estate of CalvinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API