Legal Opinion

Boykin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1942No. 7954PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.

This case was here on habeas corpus in Boykin v. Huff, 1941, 73 App.D.C. 378, 121 F.2d 865. Pursuant to our decision that the appeal had been noted in time, it has been perfected. The record, including the bill of exceptions, has been prepared several years after the trial through cooperation of the trial justice, the District Attorney, and counsel assigned to represent appellant.

The crime charged was pandering as defined in Section 181, Tit. 6, D.C.Code (1929), Act of June 25, 1910, 36 Stat. 833, c. 404, § 3 [now D.C.Code (1940) §§ 22— 2707, 22—2710],

“Any person…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Badders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shokuwan Shimabukuro v. Higeyoshi NagayamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Chuy v. Philadelphia Eagles Football ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Nationwide Independent Directory Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1974
  4. Byas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API