Legal Opinion

State v. Jacobson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 2004No. A03-1782PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The state charged ' defendant Richard Jacobson with conspiracy tó procure unlawful voting and conspiracy to commit forgery. Defendant pleaded not guilty and filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The district court denied the motion to dismiss, and later granted the state’s motion to suppress evidence relevant to defendant’s defense that he relied on the advice of counsel and on an official interpretation of the law when he devised a plan to get voters to list his business address as their place of residence. The district court concluded that any reliance on the advice…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. In Re Commission Investigation of Issues Governed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 216a.036Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API