Legal Opinion

State v. Brechon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1984No. C2-83-1696PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Appellants were arrested at Honeywell corporate headquarters in Minneapolis and charged with trespassing. Prior to trial the state moved to prevent defendants from presenting evidence pertaining to necessity or justification defenses unless certain conditions were met. The state also sought to preclude defendants from asserting a “claim of right” defense. The trial court ruled that the state had the burden of disproving “claim of right” and that defendants could offer evidence about their reasons for committing the act, whether because of moral, political or religious beliefs,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. State v. RaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. WicklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. AuchampachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API