Legal Opinion

Docherty v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 2006No. 1952 C.D. 2005PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Christopher Docherty (Claimant) petitions for review of the August 22, 2005, order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR), which reversed a referee’s decision granting unemployment compensation benefits (UC benefits) to Claimant. We reverse.

Claimant worked full time as a phlebo-tomist for Pottsville Hospital (Employer). On March 2, 2005, Claimant entered the room of a five-year-old female patient (Patient). The room had two beds approximately eight feet apart; Patient was in one bed and another young patient occupied the other bed. Patient’s parents…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Navickas v. Unemployment Compensation Review BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Eshbach v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Rebel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Bruce v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Sipps v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Grand Sport Auto Body v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Glenn v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Dillon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API