Legal Opinion

Lennox v. Hendricks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Douglas County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Loed, J.:

This was an action of ejectment brought to recover a certain piece of land described in the complaint. There is nothing in the pleadings to require further notice. The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury; and the principal facts found and relied upon to sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment thereon, are, that in 1866 John Cox and wife sold and conveyed to one Tom Munds a certain portion of his donation claim containing two hundred acres; that at the time of the sale of said land by Cox to Munds, it was surveyed and the corners of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ZeppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
  2. Turner v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Blair v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  4. Sellick & Sellick v. AddamsNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  5. Robertson v. M'NielNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ross v. DeLorenzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Drury Et Ux v. PekarOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gallagher v. KelliherOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Harris Et Ux v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Hammack v. OldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API