Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Senior Judge.
Plaintiffs, after having their protests dismissed by the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”), bring this action as a post-award procurement protest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1). Defendant, after filing an administrative record (“AR”), contests the court’s jurisdiction over this matter by filing a Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs oppose Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and move for supplementation of the administrative record.
FACTS.
This litigation has its genesis in a program initiated by the Department of State (“DoS”) *525and the United States Agency for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Phoenix Air Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- HDM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Blue Water Environmental, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Datamill, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- International Genomics Consortium v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Hydraulics International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Management & Training Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018