Datamill, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Before the court in this post-award bid protest are plaintiffs petition for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief; defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, motion for judgment upon the administrative record; and plaintiffs motion for judgment upon the administrative *743record.1 In this ease, plaintiff, an incumbent contractor providing logistics and supply database management support to the Counter Rocket, Artillery Mortar (“C-RAM”) Program Office within the United States Army (“Army”) Aviation Missile Command, asserts…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- BayFirst Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- McAfee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Wildflower International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Mission Essential Personnel, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.