Legal Opinion

Datamill, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 23, 2010No. 09-872 CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court in this post-award bid protest are plaintiffs petition for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief; defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, motion for judgment upon the administrative record; and plaintiffs motion for judgment upon the administrative *743record.1 In this ease, plaintiff, an incumbent contractor providing logistics and supply database management support to the Counter Rocket, Artillery Mortar (“C-RAM”) Program Office within the United States Army (“Army”) Aviation Missile Command, asserts…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. BayFirst Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. McAfee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Wildflower International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Mission Essential Personnel, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API