Legal Opinion

Runkel v. City of Springfield

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided September 9, 2019No. 3:18-cv-03206Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION DIANE RUNKEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-03206 ) CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, and ) JAMES O. LANGFELDER, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (d/e 8) filed by Defendants City of Springfield (the City) and James O. Langfelder. Because Counts I through III of Plaintiff Diane Runkel’s Complaint (d/e 1) state claims for which relief can be granted, the motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The following facts come from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Tara Luevano v. Walmart Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API