Legal Opinion

Regency Transportation, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 6, 2016No. SJC 11873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

Regency Transportation, Inc. (Regency), appeals from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board affirming in part the denial of an abatement of the motor vehicle use tax assessed against it under G. L. c. 641, § 2. We granted Regency’s application for direct appellate review to decide whether an unappor-tioned use tax imposed on Regency’s interstate fleet of vehicles violates the commerce clause of the United States Constitution. For the reasons discussed herein, we conclude it does not.

1. Background. The essential facts are not disputed. Regency is a Massachusetts S corporation that operates a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Worldwide TechServices, LLC v. Comm'r of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. West Beit Olam Cemetery Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  3. WorldWide TechServices, LLC v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API