Legal Opinion

Target Corp. v. LCH Pavement Consultants, LLC

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 9, 2013No. Civ. No. 12-1912 (JNE/JJK)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

JEFFREY J. KEYES, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Target Corporation’s Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 198.) The Court held a hearing on Plaintiffs motion on July 30, 2013. Based on the parties’ submissions and arguments, together with all pleadings, records, and files herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 198), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted to the extent it requests leave to seek punitive damages…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. In Re Milk Products Antitrust Litigation. Rainy Lake One Stop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  4. Carolyn Freeman v. Scott Busch Gene C. Hildreth John Hatfield Simpson College, Carolyn Freeman v. Scott BuschCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Benner v. St. Paul Pub. Sch.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
  2. Lollie v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
  3. Benner v. Saint Paul Public Schools, I.S.D. 625District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  4. Benson v. HarpsteadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  5. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Cardio Flow, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API