Legal Opinion

Heyman v. Heyman

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 29, 1982No. 81 C 6873PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum

LEIGHTON, District Judge.

This suit was filed after the plaintiff discovered that defendant, from whom she was estranged but living separately from him in the same apartment, had attached a wire and jack to her bedroom telephone and wiretapped her private conversations with others. In her three-count complaint, she alleges that this conduct is actionable under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511, 2520; that it violated an Illinois criminal statute, Ill.Rev.Stat.1979, ch. 38, § 14—2, which prohibits electronic eavesdropping; and that as a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. William Allan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  4. Beverly Camp Simpson v. John G. Simpson, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Anonymous v. AnonymousCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Donald Ray Pritchard v. Zee Warren PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. Marano v. HollandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Catherine A. Heggy v. T.L. HeggyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Jillian Kempf v. Karl Gene KempfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API