Legal Opinion
De Carlo v. Ratner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 30, 2002No. 01 CIV. 10076(NRB)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
BUCHWALD, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se, Philip De Carlo (“plaintiff’ or “De Carlo”), filed this action on November 14, 2001, alleging legal malpractice, breach of contract, fraud, and civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985, arising out of his representation by defendant James T. Ratner (“defendant” or “Ratner”) in the case United States of America ex rel and Philip De Carlo v. Kiewit/AFC Enterprises, 94 Civ. 5741(SWK). Presently before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss this action as time barred under the relevant statute of limitations. Further,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kush v. RutledgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. Nia Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Peter J. Malley v. New York City Board of Education City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Buchwald v. Renco Group, Inc. (In Re Magnesium Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- De La Fuente v. DCI Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Carruthers v. FlaumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Tenamee v. SchmuklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- MF Global Holdings Ltd. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.