Legal Opinion

State v. Lang

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1984No. 14408PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

Michael Lang appeals a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict against him for three counts of distribution of marijuana with consideration and one count of unauthorized manufacture or distribution of a substance with high potential for abuse. We affirm.

Pursuant to a drug investigation, Michael Sanders, a paid informant, purchased drugs from appellant on four separate occasions. The sheriff and deputy sheriff monitored these transactions by recorders placed on the informant. The purchases were also witnessed by the informant’s girlfriend, Karen Huber. Four…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. United States v. William Rose and Robert PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Aida Gonzales-Benitez, United States of America v. Ambrosio Hernandez-CoronelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Bruce BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. Iron NecklaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. DowningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. StarrNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API