United States v. Aida Gonzales-Benitez, United States of America v. Ambrosio Hernandez-Coronel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and CONTI, * District Judge. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
Aida Gonzales-Benitez and Ambrosio Hernandez-Coronel were convicted for importing and distributing heroin in violation of 21 Ü.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a)(1), 841(a)(1). On appeal they argue that the trial court gave incorrect jury instructions on the defense of entrapment and that the court erred in various other respects. We consider these contentions below, after stating the facts. 1
Ana Maria Gutierrez, a paid informer who had worked on prior occasions with the Drug Enforcement Administration,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Emslie Leander Moore, United States of America v. Floyd Moore, United States of America v. Pieter Cornelis PannekoekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. John Robert Heck, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Michael Allen WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Roy Moreno Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert H. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Lynn Dale Bogart, Edward Elbert Wingender, Teodaro Risquez, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Peter Wylie, United States of America v. Sheldon Perluss, United States of America v. David BachrachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Frank CitroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.