Legal Opinion
State v. Iron Necklace
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1988No. 15759, 15787PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
Dorothy Iron Necklace and Clayton Iron Necklace (Dorothy, Clayton, and collectively Iron Necklaces or appellants), appeal from jury verdicts convicting them of grand theft and burglary. We affirm.
Appellants raise some sixteen issues which will be defined in the course of the opinion.
On the morning of September 11, 1986, the Spink County Sheriff’s Office received a report of a jewelry theft at the Stacey Drug Store in Redfield, South Dakota. As a result of the investigation and some information available, which will be discussed in detail in issue one, hereafter, Deputy Sheriff…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. KnechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. LamontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. LownesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. PackedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.