McMullan v. Dickinson Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from- an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Belden, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict of $235.40 in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
After the determination of the questions involved in a former appeal in this cause (60 Minn. 156, 62 N. W. 120) it was brought to trial upon the merits, and a verdict had for plaintiff. The present appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
Because of the nature of the questions raised at this time it is advisable to set out the writing signed by the parties, and which is made the basis of plaintiff’s cause of action. It is as follows:
“This agreement, made this 25th day of February, A. D. 1892, between the Dickinson Company, a corporation existing under the General…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bolles v. SachsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Horn v. Western Land Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- In re the Election of Directors of the Argus Printing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- McMullan v. Dickinson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Nicollet National Bank v. City BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Littell v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Roxana Petroleum Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.