In re the Election of Directors of the Argus Printing Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
PPEAL from district court, Cass county; Hon. William B. McConnell, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, C. J.
On this appeal we are asked to review tke judgment of the district court in summary proceedings instituted under § 2932 of tke Compiled Laws to determine *436the rights of certain persons to the offices of directors of the Argus Printing Company, a corporation. This statute provides that upon the application of any person or body corporate aggrieved by any election held by any corporate body, or any proceedings thereof, the district judge of the district in which the election is held must proceed forthwith summarily to hear the allegations and proofs of the parties, or otherwise inquire into the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States Tr. Co. of New York v. . U.S. Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Pullman v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McHenry v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Holcomb v. ForsythSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Standard Power & Light Corp. v. Investment Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- Casper v. Kalt-Zimmers Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.