Legal Opinion

Department of Community & Regional Affairs, State v. Sisters of Providence in Washington

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1988No. S-2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

At issue in this case is whether the State must grant a subsidy to the Sisters of Providence for a construction project at Providence Hospital in Anchorage. The law providing for such subsidies, AS 29.90, was repealed on July 26, 1983. Providence did not apply for the aid until Sept. 20, 1985, more than two years after the effective date of repeal. However, the repeal included a grandfather clause which provided that those “receiving or entitled to receive” the subsidy prior to the repeal would continue to do so. Ch. 95, § 9, SLA 1983, Temporary and Special Acts. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lynden Transport, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. Aleut CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Alaska Public Employees Association v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Kjarstad v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Robert T. Merrill v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Marlow v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Chiropractors for Justice v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cora G. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS, Justin D. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API