Legal Opinion
State v. Hemrich
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1916No. 13497PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered April 24, 1916, upon a conviction of violating the state-wide prohibition law, upon stipulated facts, after overruling a demurrer to the information.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Defendant was accused of a violation of the state wide prohibition law, commonly known as initiative measure No. 3. Laws of 1915, p. 2; Rem. 1915 Code, § 6262-1 et seq. The information charged that:
“He, said Alvin Hemrich, in the county of King, state of Washington, on the 9th day of February, 1916, did then and there wilfully and unlawfully sell to one Fred M. Lathe certain intoxicating liquor, to wit; two bottles containing malt liquor, said malt liquor not then and there containing any alcohol, and being commonly known as ‘Lifestaff,’ receiving in payment therefor from said Fred M. Lathe…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Marks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Sarlls v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Campbell v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- State v. FredericksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Schmitt v. F. W. Cook Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Davis v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re SpeerIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. Centennial Brewing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.