Legal Opinion

Nix v. City of Andalusia

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1926No. 4 Div. 215PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

There was at one time some uncertainty as to whether additional punishment, in cases suc-h as here considered, should be fixed by the judge or jury trying the case on appeal to the circuit court, but those questions are now settled. Guin v. City of Tuscaloosa, ante, p. 61, 106 So. 64.

Under the law as it now stands the power is with the trial judge to fix the punishment, and, if the verdict of the jury, finding the defendant guilty and fixing a fine, goes further, and fixes a hard labor punishment, the judge trying the case may treat that part of the verdict fixing hard labor as surplusage,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reed v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Ex parte RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Wadsworth v. DunnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. People v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Guin v. City of TuscaloosaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Shelby County v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Rose v. MagroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Tidmore v. MillsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Nodd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API