Legal Opinion

Brunner v. McCullough

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1963No. Civ. A. 26349PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, District Judge.

The only unresolved question in this motor vehicle case is the extent, if any, of the third-party defendants’ insurance coverage of the defendant, William A. McCullough, Jr. The plaintiff’s action has been settled, and the defendant voluntarily dismissed his counterclaim. Only the third-party action of William A. McCullough, Jr., hereinafter referred to as “McCullough,” and the cross-claim between the insurance companies are at issue.

All of the parties have waived a jury trial and extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law.

When this accident occurred, McCullough…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. Clauss v. American Automobile and Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simmons v. JeffordsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. LinnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Home Insurance Company v. MonacoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Federal Insurance v. Cablevision Systems Development Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
  5. Continental Insurance v. McKainDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API