Brunner v. McCullough
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, District Judge.
The only unresolved question in this motor vehicle case is the extent, if any, of the third-party defendants’ insurance coverage of the defendant, William A. McCullough, Jr. The plaintiff’s action has been settled, and the defendant voluntarily dismissed his counterclaim. Only the third-party action of William A. McCullough, Jr., hereinafter referred to as “McCullough,” and the cross-claim between the insurance companies are at issue.
All of the parties have waived a jury trial and extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law.
When this accident occurred, McCullough…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Clauss v. American Automobile and Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simmons v. JeffordsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. LinnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Home Insurance Company v. MonacoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Federal Insurance v. Cablevision Systems Development Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Continental Insurance v. McKainDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.