Legal Opinion
Federal Insurance v. Cablevision Systems Development Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 26, 1987No. 85 Civ. 0250PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
In this case three primary coinsurers contest the apportionment of defense costs that were expended on behalf of an insured. In 1983 Cablevision Systems Development Company and affiliated corporations, partnerships, and individuals (“Ca-blevision”) were sued in an action entitled Nishimura v. Dolan, 83 Civ. 0085 (JRB) (E.D.N.Y.) (the “Nishimura action”). At the time Cablevision held, among others, four Comprehensive General Liability Insurance policies from three separate insurers during the period relevant to the Nishi-mura action: one policy from Federal Insurance…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- McDaniel v. PatySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Servidone Construction Corp. v. Security InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Gordon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bellefonte Reinsurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Bellefonte Reinsurance Co. v. The Aetna Casualty And Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Scottsdale Insurance v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1992
- Federal Insurance v. Cablevision Systems Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.