Sharp v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This action is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (“Pis.’ Mot. Summ. J.,” docket entry 20); defendant’s response to plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (“Def.’s Response,” docket entry 22); and plaintiffs’ reply in support of their motion (“Pis.’ Reply,” docket entry 23). In addition, the Court has before it the parties’ list of stipulated facts (“Stipulation,” docket entry 21). For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
Much of the factual background of this case is set forth in the Court’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sharp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Sharp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010