Legal Opinion
Sharp v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 26, 2009No. 2008-5105PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, which denied its motion to dismiss, and granted the motion for summary judgment of Patricia Sharp, Margaret Haver-kamp, and Iva Rogers, permitting them to receive Survivor Benefit Plan (“SBP”) payments unreduced by the amount of their reinstated Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (“DIC”) payments. Sharp v. United States, 82 Fed.Cl. 222 (2008). Because the Court of Federal Claims correctly determined that 38 U.S.C. § 1311(e) partially repealed 10 U.S.C. § 1450(c)(1), we affirm.
BACKGROUND
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Glaxo Operations Uk Limited v. Donald J. Quigg, Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- W.C. v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Griglock v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Reginald Kirtz v. Trans Union LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- DGR Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.