Legal Opinion
Kantner v. Combustion Engineering
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 27, 1988No. 1:08-adr-00008PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LOUGHLIN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these actions seek damages arising out of the drowning deaths of Paul Kantner and Albert D. Morin in separate incidents near the base of the Pontook Dam in Dummer, New Hampshire. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Three of the defendants, Combustion Engineering, Inc. (“Combustion”), H.E. Sargent, Inc. (“Sargent”), and Yankee Construction Corp. (“Yankee”), have moved for summary judgment on all of the plaintiffs’ claims except those alleging willful or intentional acts, contending…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- John Early v. Eastern TransferCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Carolyn L. Ducey v. United States of America, Lois M. Olson v. United States of America, Helen Grugel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Collins v. MartellaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Kenison v. DuboisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Coan v. New Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Soraghan v. Mt. Cranmore Ski Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Ward v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.