Legal Opinion
Pi Electronics Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 20, 2003No. 96-664CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
Six years after filing a complaint for breach of contract and two years after trial on liability, plaintiff was allowed to amend its complaint to plead a taking of its trade secret. After plaintiff filed its takings claim in November 2002, defendant challenged it as facially deficient under RCFC 12(b)(6) because, inter alia, plaintiff cannot establish as an element of its claim that the United States authorized a taking. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
An extensive factual background and procedural history precedes this dispositive motion. See Pi Elecs. Corp. v.…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Detroit Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Century Exploration New Orleans, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.