Hoban v. Sandford & Stillman Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Ou plaintiff’s rule to show canse.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lippincott, J.
Although the rule to show cause in this-case in behalf of the plaintiff is a general one, yet it was-allowed on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, and must be so treated.
The cause was tried once before at the Circuit, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. A rule to show cause was allowed the defendant, and after argument this court made the rule absolute and directed a new trial. Upon the new trial the same evidence in toto was produced on both sides, and the trial justice, following the opinion' in the Supreme-Court,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wynne v. Newman's Adm'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Maher v. ThroppSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Finch v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Hobler v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Pemberton v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ross v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WaldoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Fulmer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Shore v. ShoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Moore v. Rosecliff Realty Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.