Legal Opinion

Maher v. Thropp

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1896PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This is an action by a servant against his master to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in the master’s employment. He was an ordinary workman, who assisted in the boilermaking shops, and at the time of the injury was engaged in striking with a sledge hammer upon the boiler. It is admitted that he was furnished with proper implements to do his work, but by the direction of the foreman of the boilermakers he undertook to do his work with other tools, in consequence of which he received the injury complained of.

It is not open…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Nord Deutscher Lloyd Steamship Co. v. IngebregstenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  2. O'Brien v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Cross v. Passumpsic Fibre Leather Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  3. Curley v. HoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  4. McQueeny v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Morrison v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API