Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Henry

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1933No. Docket No. 2327PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Defendant was charged in an amended information with the crime of violation of section 2, chapter 638, Statutes of 1931 (Deering’s Gen. Laws, vol. 2, p. 2545, Act 5130b). Prom the judgment entered on a verdict of guilty and from an order denying his motion for a new trial he has appealed.

It is urged that the evidence does not sustain the verdict, in that it does not show a violation of the act.

C. V. Wellman and Robert J. Herron, two of the principal witnesses for the prosecution, were shown a certain advertisement appearing in a Los Angeles newspaper on or about June 16,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re CardinalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ex Parte Quong WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. GarrottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Carter v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cyphers v. AllynSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. State v. PateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. In Re MarriottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API