Mickelson v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Appellant, Luke Mickelson, was convicted of one count of possession of a deadly weapon with unlawful intent under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-8-103 (LexisNexis 2007) and was simultaneously acquitted of a charge of aggravated assault under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6 — 2—502(a)(iii) (LexisNexis 2007). Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, that there was a fatal variance between the charging document and his eventual conviction, and that the verdict was inconsistent. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Although they phrase them somewhat differently, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- William D. Blue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Bromley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Tanner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Trujillo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spagner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Cramer v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Workers' Compensation Claim of Eaton v. State ex rel. Department of Workforce ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.