Legal Opinion

Mickelson v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2008No. 06-156PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Luke Mickelson, was convicted of one count of possession of a deadly weapon with unlawful intent under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-8-103 (LexisNexis 2007) and was simultaneously acquitted of a charge of aggravated assault under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6 — 2—502(a)(iii) (LexisNexis 2007). Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, that there was a fatal variance between the charging document and his eventual conviction, and that the verdict was inconsistent. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Although they phrase them somewhat differently, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. William D. Blue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bromley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Tanner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Trujillo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Spagner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Worker's Compensation Claim of Cramer v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Workers' Compensation Claim of Eaton v. State ex rel. Department of Workforce ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API