Mitchell v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Justice.
Appellant Quinton Mitchell appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress and motions in limine. Because the trial court failed to require the proper foundation for the Romberg field sobriety test under Harper v. State, 249 Ga. 519, 524-526 (1) (292 SE2d 389) (1982), we reverse on that ground. We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s rulings.
When reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, an appellate court must construe the evidentiary record in the light most favorable to the factual findings and judgment of the trial court. This means that the reviewing…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. TurnquestSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- State v. TurnquestSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Ammons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- MACMASTER v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Licata v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.