Licata v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
**498We granted certiorari to consider what, if any, Miranda-type warning law enforcement must give before asking a suspect in custody to perform acts protected by Georgia's right against compelled self-incrimination under Article I, Section I, Paragraph XVI of the Georgia Constitution of 1983 ("Paragraph XVI"), and whether a suspect in custody is entitled to the advice of counsel when asked to submit to a state-administered breath test. The first question rested on the premise that the suspect in this case, Michael Licata, was in custody at the time he was asked to undergo…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Olevik v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Larry J. Sprosty v. Dan Buchler, Acting Warden, Racine Correctional Institution, and James E. Doyle, Attorney General of the State of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WaldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- State v. LOPEZ-CARDONASupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- Catarina Castro-Moran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Connie Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Licata v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.