Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Judge.
The rule is well established in Georgia that the testimony of a party who offers himself as a witness in his own behalf is to be construed most strongly against him when it is self-contradictory, vague or equivocal. Western <&c. B. Co. v. Evans, 96 Ga. 481 (23 SE 494); Southern B. Co. v. Hobbs, 121 Ga. 428 (49 SE 294), and many subsequent cases. We cannot agree with, appellant’s contention, however, that this rule should be applied under the circumstances existing here.
This court has strictly applied the rule and has held that it does not extend to or include a pre-trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Dennis v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shiver v. Norfolk-Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Marietta International Sales, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Busbee v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Whisnant v. WhisnantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967