Legal Opinion

Marietta International Sales, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1970No. 45311PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

There is no dispute as to the existence of the policy or as to its terms with respect to a theft loss of a consigned motor vehicle. The trial court in its order granting defendant’s motion stated that applying the rationale of our decision in Division 3 of Chandler v. Gately, 119 Ga. App. 513 (3) (167 SE2d 697), plaintiff was bound by the out-of-court statement of its president that the truck was not held for "resale”; and this evidence demands judgment for defendant. In Chandler, the rule of evidence that the testimony of a party who offers himself as a witness in his own…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Langenback v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Phœnix Insurance v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Baker v. Lowe Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Tuggle v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shiver v. Norfolk-Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Lane v. Tift County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Southern Heritage Management Co. v. Elrod's Custom Drapery Workroom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Carter v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Lane v. Tift County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API