Marietta International Sales, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
There is no dispute as to the existence of the policy or as to its terms with respect to a theft loss of a consigned motor vehicle. The trial court in its order granting defendant’s motion stated that applying the rationale of our decision in Division 3 of Chandler v. Gately, 119 Ga. App. 513 (3) (167 SE2d 697), plaintiff was bound by the out-of-court statement of its president that the truck was not held for "resale”; and this evidence demands judgment for defendant. In Chandler, the rule of evidence that the testimony of a party who offers himself as a witness in his own…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Langenback v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Phœnix Insurance v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Baker v. Lowe Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Tuggle v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shiver v. Norfolk-Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Lane v. Tift County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Southern Heritage Management Co. v. Elrod's Custom Drapery Workroom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Carter v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Lane v. Tift County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997