Legal Opinion

Whisnant v. Whisnant

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1967No. 42895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

One of the controlling questions involved in this case is whether or not the defendant owed the plaintiff the duty to exercise ordinary care.

The status of an invited guest is determined by the intent and purpose of the host at the time of the invitation. In this case it is sought to prove, as it was alleged, that the plaintiff was invited on the trip for the purpose of rendering substantial assistance to the defendant and her husband. There is no evidence to support such a conclusion. The defendant testified positively that such was not the purpose of the invitation. The plaintiff “asked” to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Ware v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Shockey v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. Young v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patton v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. French v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. French v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API