Wysocki v. Bradley & Hubbard Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff sought compensation for hernia alleged to have resulted from an injury arising out of and in course of his employment with the defendant Bradley & Hubbard Company, in May, 1930. After hearing the evidence, the commissioner on May 23d, 1930, held that the claimant had established no history of an accidental injury arising out of and in course of his employment, but was suffering from a large easily reducible hernia with large relaxed inguinal rings, and reached the conclusion that the hernia had been present for some time before the date of the claimed injury. The commissioner…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Loomis v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- McCulloch v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Gonirenki v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Saddlemire v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Big Horn County v. IlesWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Mustanen v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Sugrue v. ChampionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Meadow v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.