Legal Opinion

Army Navy Bingo, Garrison 2196 v. Plowden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 2, 1984No. 22073PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This action challenges the constitutionality of the prize limitations and the residence requirement for bingo operators found in S. C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2590 (1983). The bingo operators assert that the statute violates the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause. We disagree.

The trial judge held the prize limitations constitutional and the residence requirement unconstitutional. We hold that neither the limits on prizes nor the residence requirement denies the bingo operators due process of law.

S. C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2590 (1983) provides in pertinent part:

Any person or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Ah Sin v. WittmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Feldman v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Unisys Corp. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board Division of General Services Information Technology Management OfficeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Fraternal Order of Police v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Home Health Service, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Secretary of State v. St. Augustine ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API