Legal Opinion
Plaisance v. Travelers Insurance
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided May 20, 1994No. 1:93-cv-01021PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINING, Chief Judge.
After carefully considering the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court hereby adopts it as the opinion and order of this court. This court notes that the magistrate judge’s conclusion that the 1991 amendments to the Civil Rights Act are not retroactive has been confirmed by the United States Supreme Court. See Landgraf v. USI Film Products, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1522, 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994); Rivers v. Davison, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (April 26, 1994).
SO ORDERED.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
HARPER, United States…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ray v. Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2003
- Waldemar v. American Cancer SocietyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- Butler v. Matsushita Communication Industrial Corp. of U.S.A.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- JLM Enterprises, Inc. v. Houston General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2002
- Brown v. Westinghouse Savannah River Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.