Legal Opinion

Brown v. Westinghouse Savannah River Corp.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided June 18, 1996No. Civil Action No. CV 195-68PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BOWEN, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in this action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. Defendant Westinghouse Savannah River Company (‘Westinghouse”)1 argues that Plaintiff has failed to establish a prima facie case of discriminatory discharge under Title VII. Further, Westinghouse contends Plaintiff cannot rebut Westinghouse’s articulated, non-diseriminatoiy reason for Plaintiffs termination. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

I.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Westinghouse SavannahCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API