Palmer v. Beall
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Delaware Superior Court; Robert M. Van Atta, (Judge. Action by Lloyd Beall and others against George W. Palmer. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, the de- fendant appeals.^
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in appellees’ favor in an action brought by them in the court below against appellant to replevin corn and for damages for its detention.
In this court there are ten errors assigned including the one challenging the ruling of the trial court on the motion for new trial. The motion for new trial contains sixteen separate grounds or reasons therefor. In his brief, under the heading “Points and Authorities”, appellant states thirteen general propositions which may have some application to one or more of the rulings assigned as error, and intended to be relied on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Leach v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Boland v. ClaudelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Graham v. Henderson Elevator Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Rook v. Straus Bros.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Nave v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Harrold v. WhistlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Leedy v. IdleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.