Legal Opinion

Rook v. Straus Bros.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1916No. 8,924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Adams Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Special Judge. Action between the Straus Brothers Company and Rhoda C. Rook' and others. From a judgment for the former, the latter, appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Felt, P.. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quitting the title to certain real estate. There was a special finding of facts on which the trial court stated its conclusions of law. The errors assigned seek to bring into review the action of the court in ruling on the demurrer to the complaint, in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial, and in its conclusions of law stated on the special finding of facts.

It is insisted by appellee "that no questions are presented because of defects in the transcript, in the assignment of errors, and in the preparation of appellants’ briefs. Our…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Palmer v. BeallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Kaufman v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bray v. TardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Ingle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brayton v. City of RushvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. State ex rel. Salt Creek Civil Township v. StevensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Chastain v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Cook v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Cook v. Cook's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API