Legal Opinion

Leedy v. Idle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1918No. 9,775PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Kosciusko Circuit Court; Francis E. Bowser, Judge. Action by Amsa Leedy and others against Talmon H.-Idle, trustee, and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.,

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

Appellants, as residents and taxpayers of Monroe school township in Kosciusko county, instituted this action to enjoin appellees from erecting a certain schoolhouse in said township and from *107selling the bonds of the township to meet the cost thereof. The trial court'made a special finding of the facts in issue, and stated, as its conclusions of law thereon, that appellants take nothing by their action, and that appellees recover their costs. This appeal follows.

1. There are three specifications in the assignment of errors relied on for a reversal, and the first of these challenges the action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BeallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Rose v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Jeffersonville School Township v. School City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. McClellan v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stutesman v. Sigerfoos, TrusteeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RetzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Martindale v. CorbinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Sanders-Egbert Co. v. GettsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Todd v. GoshornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API