Legal Opinion

Lucky Boy Mining & Milling Co. v. Moore

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1922No. Civil No. 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Mohave. E. Elmo Bollinger, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

E. C. Moore commenced this action August 27, 1919, against Lucky Boy Mining & Milling Company, Oatman Boy Mining & Milling Company, corporations, and R. A. Watson, alleging that plaintiff had worked and labored for the Oatman Boy, Mining & Milling Company (whose manager and superintendent Watson was) on certain named and described mining claims under lease from defendant *293Lucky Boy Mining & Milling Company, owner, and that said lease permitted the lessee to develop and work said mining claims. On the same date summons was issued directed to above-named defendants. The return on summons dated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Von Arx v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  3. Hoye Coal Co. v. ColvinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lanier v. LovettArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Blandy v. Modern Box Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Ruck Corp. v. WoudenbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Noonan v. MontgomeryArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bissonnette v. Alpine, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API