Legal Opinion

Noonan v. Montgomery

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1922No. Civil No. 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlanigan, J.

This is an action in mandamus, brought by appellant against appellee Montgomery, sheriff of Maricopa county, to compel the execution and delivery to appellant of sheriff’s deed to certain real property of W. W. Bruner, sold under execution issued on a judgment obtained by appellant against Bruner in the superior court of Maricopa county, *313■which judgment was docketed in that court on May-23, 1918. From the return of the sheriff to the alternative writ and other pleadings in the case the following facts appear: Plaintiff’s judgment was for the sum of $135.80 and interest. Execution was issued…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hendrick v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Herman v. SanteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hume v. ConduittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Shawhan v. LofferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Creach v. AnguloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Evans v. HallasArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Turner v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  4. Hershey v. BantaArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Andriano v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API